Intro

SPEAKER_00 0:05

Welcome to the 5-Minute Prime Podcast. Quick actionable tips to master personal finance and real estate investing. In just five minutes a day, we'll help you build wealth and achieve financial freedom. Hey Prime Investors, Martin Maxwell here. Welcome back to the Five Minute Prime Podcast.

The loss

SPEAKER_00 0:24

A $38,000 loss on your tax return. Real legal signed off by your CPA. And your tax bill didn't move $1. Say you and your spouse both work salaried jobs. Together, about $240,000 a year. Last year you bought your first rental, a three-bedroom house outside Raleigh, North Carolina, for $360,000. A family signed a 12-month lease at $2,600 a month. Then a cost segregation firm called. For $4,500, they'd split the house into parts that depreciate fast, take bonus depreciation on those parts, and quote, turn your rental into a tax shelter. They projected about $9,100 in savings. You paid for the study. Here's how the rental looks on your draft return. Rent collected, $31,200. Operating costs and mortgage interest, $315. Depreciation, $37,700. Almost $30,000 of that is bonus depreciation from the study. Bottom line on the rental, minus $38,000.

01 · The cover note

SPEAKER_00 1:28

Then your CPA's cover note. Three lines long. The loss is real, she writes, but it's passive. And at your income, it can't touch your salaries. There's a $25,000 allowance for rental losses for owners who actively participate. It shrinks by a dollar for every $2 of modified adjusted gross income over $100,000. At $150,000, it's gone. You're at $240,000. Expected saving this year? About $9,000. Actual saving? Zero. The $38,000 is carried forward. You paid $4,500 for a saving that didn't happen. And your spouse has already found two videos about unlocking it.

02 · Three options

SPEAKER_00 2:08

So, three options. Pick one before I tell you mine. Option one, turn the house into a short-term rental next year. When the average guest stays seven days or less and you materially participate, usually meaning you do the work yourself, 100 plus hours a year and more than anyone else, cleaners included, the losses stop being passive and can offset your salaries. The study was built for exactly this. Option two. One of you cuts back at work and qualifies as a real estate professional. More than 750 hours a year, more than half your working time, plus material participation in the rental. That's the classic way to use these losses. Option three, keep the family on their lease and carry the $38,000 forward. And next time, run the passive loss test before anyone sells you a study. Three options. Hit pause, decide, then come back.

03 · The breakdown

SPEAKER_00 3:03

Alright, start with what went right, because something did. The study is legitimate. Cost segregation is real, bonus depreciation is real, and that $38,000 loss is real. On Monday we counted all four ways a rental earns, and tax was the fourth. This is where the fourth one gets complicated. The question the pitch skipped comes before everything else. Can this loss touch your other income at all? For a long-term rental, rental losses are passive by default. Passive losses offset passive income, not salaries. The one exception for regular landlords is that $25,000 allowance, and at your income it's fully phased out. So a lower tax bill this year was never on the table. And that was knowable before anyone spent $4,500. I wrote about this in the book. A cost-seg study can look like a windfall and not be one yet. These rules aren't a loophole that closed on you by accident. Congress wrote them in 1986 to stop exactly this salaried people buying paper losses to shelter their wages. The study works the way it was sold. The rules work the way they were written. Nobody checked whether the two fit together for you. Now, option one. Going short term does change the rules. For the future. Here's the part the videos skip. The losses you've already suspended stay passive. They can only offset that property's own income or other passive income. What turns non-passive is next year's losses. And with the bonus depreciation already taken, next year's losses are a fraction of 38,000. Look at your own return. Of the 37.7 in depreciation, only about 8,000 was the regular kind the study didn't speed up. Next year looks a lot more like that 8 than like 38. Meanwhile, your 12-month tenant becomes guests, cleaning turns, furnishing, pricing every night, and around Raleigh, often a zoning permit to run it at all. If you wanted that business anyway, fine. As a tax move, it's backwards. Option two is a career change wearing a tax label. More than 750 hours, and more than half of all your working hours in real estate. For someone with a full-time salaried job, that means giving up most of the job. And the 38,000 already suspended stays tied to the house either way. It makes sense only if one of you was moving into real estate full-time regardless, with hours that are real and logged.

The verdict

SPEAKER_00 5:34

Option 3 is the right call. And it isn't a consolation prize. The $38,000 becomes a suspended passive loss. It offsets the rental's own income in later years, or other passive income if you have it. And when you sell a fully taxable sale to a buyer who isn't related to you, every suspended dollar becomes deductible against any income that year, salaries included. And if you never sell? At death, the suspended losses are allowed only to the extent they're more than the step up in basis your heirs receive. So holding forever can quietly shrink them. That's worth one conversation with your CPA and with your estate attorney years before it matters. One catch, because it ties back to the exit decision we've talked about sell, hold, or exchange. A 1031 exchange does not release those losses. No gain is recognized, so they stay suspended until a later taxable sale. Two more things to carry forward with the loss. First, timing. If you're ever tempted to close on a rental before December 31st for the write-off, depreciation starts when the house is placed in service, ready and available to rent, not actually rented. So a December closing on a rent-ready listed house counts in December. But while your losses are suspended, rushing a closing to grab a deduction buys you nothing. Second, the fast depreciation comes back. When you sell, the bonus depreciation on those reclassified parts is generally taxed as ordinary income. That's depreciation recapture. The study moved the deduction earlier. It didn't make it free. And if you already bought a study, it isn't wasted. The loss is banked. It just arrives later than the pitch said. And look at the line above the depreciation. Before any depreciation at all, the house took in 31.2 and spent 31.5, down $300 for the year. And that's before the principal part of your mortgage payment. The tax question took over the conversation, but that's the number that tells you whether the house is working. The deeper lesson is whose numbers you bought on. That $9,000 projection came from the firm selling the study. It priced every dollar at 24%, when at your income, all of that loss would land in the 22%. And the test that decides whether you see any of it is free. A paper loss is only worth what your tax situation lets it touch. Here's your challenge. Tonight, before you buy anything that promises a tax saving, write down three things. Your modified adjusted gross income from last year's return. Whether your rental is long-term or averages seven days or less per stay, and how many hours you actually work in real estate compared with your day job. If your income is over $150,000, your rental is long term, and real estate isn't your main job, your losses are almost certainly suspended. Take that to your CPA before the next pitch, not after. Under $150,000? Some or all of that $25,000 allowance may still be open. That's when a study can pay this year. Then run the house on cash flow alone. That's the number that's yours, whatever the tax rules say. The full write up, all three options side by side with the numbers, is linked right there in the show notes. I'm Martin Maxwell. This has been the 5 Minute Prime Podcast. I'll see you next episode.